<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kerry D. Wong &#187; Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kerrywong.com/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kerrywong.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash 10 on Ubuntu 64 bit &#8212; Significant Performance Improvement</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/10/18/flash-10-on-ubuntu-64-bit-significant-performance-improvement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/10/18/flash-10-on-ubuntu-64-bit-significant-performance-improvement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux/BSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64 bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flash 10 just came out a few days ago, and I just installed it using the information provided on Ubuntu Forum (I used the script from here to install on my 64bit Ubuntu).The performance of Flash 9 on Ubuntu 64 had been suboptimal. Even with a nVidia GForce 8600 graphics card, I could not view [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/10/18/flash-10-on-ubuntu-64-bit-significant-performance-improvement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyper-Threading and Dual Core Performance Comparison for Computational Intensive Applications &#8211; Update</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2007/05/22/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2007/05/22/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Sharp (C#)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-threading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimension/2007/05/22/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a post (Hyper-Threading and Dual Core Performance Comparison for Computational Intensive Applications) I wrote at the end of last year, I compared multi-threaded scientific application performance of a Pentium 4 processor with hyper-threading enabled and a Pentium D processor, and concluded that for multi-threaded scientific applications, hyper-threaded processor helped little in terms of application [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2007/05/22/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyper-Threading and Dual Core Performance Comparison for Computational Intensive Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2006/12/26/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2006/12/26/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-threading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimension/2006/12/26/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download MPThreadBench.zip There is no doubt that Hyper-Threading can, under certain circumstances, boost application performance. The performance gain is highly dependent on application type, and according to Intel, this performance gain is at an average of 15-30%. But for computational intensive multi-threaded applications, Hyper-Threading does not provide much benefit however. Here I will show some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2006/12/26/hyper-threading-and-dual-core-performance-comparison-for-computational-intensive-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

