<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kerry D. Wong &#187; Q9450</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kerrywong.com/tag/q9450/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kerrywong.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Simple Beowulf Cluster</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/11/04/a-simple-beowulf-cluster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/11/04/a-simple-beowulf-cluster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beowulf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned previously, one of the reasons I built another quad-core PC was that I wanted to do some experiments with high performance computing. Even though the idea of a two-node mini cluster does not sound like much, the principle behind it is pretty similar to much larger and more powerful clusters. Typically a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/11/04/a-simple-beowulf-cluster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Quad Core Build</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/10/29/another-quad-core-build/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/10/29/another-quad-core-build/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS P5E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quad Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I built a quad core machine about six months ago. The goal back then was to build a performance PC. Recently, I decided to build another PC so that I could have my mini-cluster.Unlike my previous build, this time I wanted to build one that is cheap, energy efficient and yet powerful. If you recall, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/10/29/another-quad-core-build/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q9450 &#8211; The LINPACK Test</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/07/06/q9450-the-linpack-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/07/06/q9450-the-linpack-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINPACK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/07/06/q9450-the-linpack-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, I decided to see how fast my quad-core PC really is in terms of the raw floating point performance measured by GFLOPS. The typical software to measure the performance of scientific calculations is LINPACK. Using Intel&#8217;s implementation, I obtained the following results (Q9450 @ 3.2GHz, O.C.): CPU frequency: 3.200 GHz Number of CPUs: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/07/06/q9450-the-linpack-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q9450 Initial OC Result</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/14/q9450-initial-oc-result/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/14/q9450-initial-oc-result/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/14/q9450-initial-oc-result/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have read speculations before its launch time that the new 45nm processors are going to be easy over clocking. So after I built the new machine, I decided to give it a try. Since I have never been a fan of overclocking, and non of the component was chosen for such a purpose, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/14/q9450-initial-oc-result/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Pictures of My New Rig</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/12/some-pictures-of-my-new-rig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/12/some-pictures-of-my-new-rig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/12/some-pictures-of-my-new-rig/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterday&#8217;s post, I listed all the components I used in my new rig. Here are some of the pictures I took while building it: Q9450 Retail Box Q9450 Retail Box (Top) &#160; Intel Q9450 Intel Q9450 Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro Versus Stock HS I cannot believe how small the stock cooler is. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/12/some-pictures-of-my-new-rig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Q9450 Arrived</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/11/my-q9450-arrived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/11/my-q9450-arrived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/11/my-q9450-arrived/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Q9450 finally arrived yesterday.Originally I had thought that Intel&#8217;s new 45nm processors would be readily available, but as it turned out most places did not have them in stock. The only 45nm processor that is readily available right now is Q9300, you can find both OEM and retail versions in many major online stores. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/04/11/my-q9450-arrived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical Difference Between Q9450 And X3350</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/28/technical-difference-between-q9450-and-x3350/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/28/technical-difference-between-q9450-and-x3350/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/28/technical-difference-between-q9450-and-x3350/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been almost two weeks since the speculated shipment dates for the Yorkfield 45nm processors. But Q9450&#8242;s are still hard to spot. It briefly appeared on Newegg in the evening of March 25 but the supply was apparently very limited and barely lasted till the next morning. And of course, early adopters had to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/28/technical-difference-between-q9450-and-x3350/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Are the 45nm Quad Cores?</title>
		<link>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/18/where-are-the-45nm-quad-cores/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/18/where-are-the-45nm-quad-cores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kwong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q9450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/18/where-are-the-45nm-quad-cores/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, all the news source speculated the imminent launch of three 45nm Quad Core Processors from Intel. And the updates to Wikipedia articles (1,2) and Intel&#8217;s own quad core where to buy page had also confirmed this. Despite the reports however, it seems that the new Q9300, Q9450 and Q9550 are nowhere to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kerrywong.com/2008/03/18/where-are-the-45nm-quad-cores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

